REMEMBER:
All project resources present and future are detailed here:
• Locals: drunkentyromancy.locals.com/post/5323758/welcome
I will update this welcome document and video in the future to make it a single article, but only after I have actually started using more of those publishing sites.
Support this Project:
• BuyMeACoffee: buymeacoffee.com/drunkentyromancer
Current publishing:
• Substack: thedrunkentyromancer.substack.com
• Rumble: rumble.com/drunkentyromancy
• YouTube: youtube.com/@DrunkenTyromancer
• Telegram: t.me/drunktyro
Video uploads here:
• YouTube: youtu.be/FX7fSEQGKyQ
• Rumble: rumble.com/v4i17h6-tilting-at-off-shore-windmills.html
• VK: vk.com/video579391090_456239027
Intro:
Another requested topic, a little modified, because I cannot see the issues as isolated objects taken out of context of the bigger picture … and herein lies my explanation for why I won’t be tilting against off-shore windmills, without at least looking at the bigger picture and WHY it is all going on.
How to assess the truth:
Are there serious ecological issues in the world? Sure.
Are the media and people in power honest about them? Not even close.
Are the puppet masters of the world misrepresenting these issues? Without question.
Brinkmanship loves a real issue it can lie about and misrepresent to make money, gain power, entrench that power, and to reduce civil liberties and human rights … this is no exception. The very fact that it creates such large stakes for their narratives is what makes it so attractive for them to lie about it … but does that mean there is no problem just because they are exaggerating, misrepresenting, and inventing things about it to distract you or cause fear to make you obedient and compliant?
You cannot rely on “official” narratives for anything, but you should also be suspicious of anyone who cannot explain in detail why they believe their alternative, and on top of this, you should look at who may make money or gain power off their proposed alternative, and always remember:
1. just because one story is partly false, doesn’t mean it is 100% false;
2. just because one story is partly or 100% false, doesn’t mean any other story is true;
3. you’re always going to be manipulated so long as you choose to hold an opinion but you don’t really understand precisely why you hold it.
Conclusion:
Don’t let anyone else define what questions you are asking, any more than you allow them to define what conclusions you can or should draw, and what options are available, because this is what they try to do, to completely manipulate you into accepting their language, their topic, their question, their evidence, their argument & reasoning, their ‘experts’, their solution set, and their chosen solution from the solution set.
How can you even see what you are missing until you reject all of it as a valid set of limitations on how you will approach the topic?